Adam Bair's Consumer Protection Resources

Sued by LVNV Funding? How the Process Actually Works

Written by Adam Bair.
A person reviewing debt collection lawsuit papers and a court summons at a kitchen table.

If LVNV Funding has sued you, the case is on a path that thousands of similar cases follow each year. Knowing the path is the first step in deciding what to do. This article walks through who LVNV is. How the case moves through court. What defenses tend to apply. And what the choices look like at each stage.

I am a Florida trial lawyer. I write about consumer protection law for a national audience. This article is general info for a consumer who has been sued by LVNV Funding and wants to know what comes next. It is not legal advice. The rules vary by state and by court. Your facts matter.

Who LVNV Funding actually is

LVNV Funding LLC is a debt buyer. It buys bundles of defaulted consumer accounts. From original creditors and from earlier-stage debt buyers. It then collects on those accounts in its own name. The accounts are usually credit card debts that the original creditor charged off and sold.

LVNV is part of a bigger structure. Resurgent Capital Services LP is often named as the servicer that handles collection and lawsuit work on the accounts. Sherman Financial Group is the parent of both. The names on your mail and court papers may vary. The corporate links matter mostly for the proof issues that come up later.

LVNV is not the company that lent you the money. That company, the original creditor, made a choice to sell the account rather than keep it. LVNV is downstream of that sale. The lawsuit is a new action by a third party. Not a continuation of your old credit card account.

Note on FDCPA scope: after Henson v. Santander (2017), debt-buyer FDCPA coverage turns on the facts. Most debt buyers, including LVNV, still qualify under the "principal purpose" prong through Resurgent Capital's servicing work. A reader looking at a different plaintiff should not assume FDCPA coverage automatically.

The path the lawsuit follows

Most consumer-debt cases brought by debt buyers follow the same arc. The names of the steps vary by state.

Filing.The complaint is filed in a court of right jurisdiction. Usually a county court or district court. Depending on the amount in controversy and the state's structure.

Service.The summons and complaint are served on you. Service can be by personal delivery. Or substituted service on a household member. Or other methods set by the state's rules. Defective service is more common in high-volume collection cases than most people realize.

Answer or default. You have a fixed number of days from service to file a written response. Often twenty or thirty. Depending on the state and court. If you file an answer, the case moves to discovery. If you do not, the plaintiff usually moves for default judgment. One is entered with no further fight.

Discovery. If the case is fought, both sides exchange info. You are usually asked for documents and to answer written questions. You can also send discovery to the plaintiff. Including requests for the documents that prove ownership of the account.

Motion practice.The plaintiff often moves for summary judgment. Asking the court to rule in its favor with no trial. Based on the documents the plaintiff has filed. You can oppose. The strength of the opposition depends heavily on the gaps in the plaintiff's proof.

Trial.A small share of cases go to trial. The plaintiff has to put on admissible evidence proving ownership of the account, the amount due, and any other claim element. This is the stage where authentication and hearsay problems with the original creditor's records often become decisive.

Judgment and post-judgment.A judgment, if entered, can be enforced through wage garnishment, bank account levy, or judgment liens. Depending on the state's rules. Post-judgment work has its own rules and time limits.

The point of walking through the path is that your leverage in the case shifts at each stage. The choices made at each stage shape the outcome.

Defenses that recur in LVNV cases

Several defenses appear over and over in cases brought by LVNV. None is automatic. Each has to be built on the specific facts.

Standing and chain of title. LVNV has to prove it owns the account. Documenting the chain from the original creditor through any intermediate buyers to LVNV requires admissible records. Bulk-sale assignments often lack signed bills of sale specific to the account. Or lack the schedules that name the account. Or come from custodians who cannot authenticate the underlying transfers.

Authentication and hearsay. Even with a clear chain of title, the underlying account records were made by the original creditor. Putting those records into evidence requires either a witness from the original creditor. Or a witness who can lay a proper foundation under the business-records exception. Witnesses from the debt buyer often cannot lay that foundation for records they did not create.

Statute of limitations. State limits periods on contract actions range from three to ten years. The clock usually runs from the date of default or last payment. A case filed after the period has run is barred.

Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.The FDCPA, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1692 and following, applies to debt collectors and debt buyers. Violations during the collection or lawsuit can support a separate claim. With statutory damages, actual damages, attorneys' fees, and costs. The fee-shifting in 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3) is what lets many consumer-defense lawyers take cases with no upfront retainer.

Account amount and post-charge-off charges. The plaintiff has to prove the amount it claims. Interest accrued after the original creditor charged off the account, and fees added by the debt buyer or earlier servicers, are sometimes not backed by admissible evidence. Or are barred by contract terms or state law.

Whether any of these defenses applies in a given case is a fact question. The reason to know they exist is to see that the plaintiff's case has elements it has to prove. Those elements are not in evidence the moment the lawsuit is filed.

What changes when the consumer responds

National data on consumer-debt cases has been steady for years. The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have both reported that most debt collection cases end in default judgment. Because most consumers do not respond. The share of consumers with a lawyer is in the low single digits.

Cases that are answered get a different mix of outcomes. Some are dismissed. Some are settled. Some are litigated through summary judgment or trial. The plaintiff that filed assuming a default has to actually prove its case. The proof is sometimes there. Sometimes not.

The first call in the case is whether to respond. After the response, the case is governed by the procedural rules of the state. And the strength of the proof on each side. None of those steps requires a default. The default is the result of inaction.

What to do at each stage

Just served.Read the summons. Find the deadline. Confirm your home against the venue rules. Find a consumer-defense attorney through the National Association of Consumer Advocates directory. The state bar's referral service. Or local legal aid. If no attorney is on board, file the answer pro se rather than miss the deadline.

During discovery. Send written discovery to the plaintiff. Request documents proving the chain of title. Request authentication of any account records. Document any FDCPA violations during the collection or lawsuit.

At summary judgment.Find gaps in the plaintiff's proof. Affidavits from custodians who cannot authenticate the underlying records. Missing assignment documents. Mismatch between the amount claimed and the records produced. The fight at summary judgment is where many of these cases turn.

At trial. The plaintiff has to put on admissible evidence. The hearsay and authentication objections that often arise are technical. Procedurally specific. That is one reason a lawyer is most useful at this stage.

Post-judgment. If a judgment has been entered, the focus shifts to exemptions, settlement, and any motion to vacate. Post-judgment options are state-specific.

What not to do

Do not ignore the lawsuit because you do not recognize the debt. The lawsuit will move on regardless. Your remedies are inside the case. Not outside it.

Do not call LVNV or its servicer to dispute the debt without thinking through what you will say. Statements made on the call can be used in the case. Partial payments or acknowledgments can sometimes affect the limits clock.

Do not assume an offer to settle for a smaller amount is the only outcome. Settlement is sometimes the right answer. Sometimes it is not. The call depends on the strength of the plaintiff's proof. Which you often cannot judge without help.

The honest summary

LVNV Funding files a lot of consumer collection lawsuits. The cases follow a set procedural path. The defenses available to consumers are real. They require timely action. The first call is whether to respond at all. After the response, the case becomes a question of proof. The proof is what the plaintiff has to put on. Not what you have to disprove.

Frequently asked questions

What is the relationship between LVNV Funding and Resurgent Capital Services?

LVNV Funding is the debt buyer that owns the accounts on paper. Resurgent Capital Services is often named as the servicer that handles collection and lawsuit work on those accounts. Both are part of the Sherman Financial Group structure.

Why is LVNV suing me when I never had an account with them?

LVNV bought the account from the original creditor or from an earlier debt buyer. The lawsuit is based on the original underlying debt. But the plaintiff is now LVNV rather than the original creditor.

Can LVNV sue me for an old debt?

Each state has a statute of limitations on contract actions. If the limits period has expired before the lawsuit was filed, the case is barred. Whether it has expired depends on the date of last activity on the account. And the state's limits period.

What if I cannot afford a lawyer?

The federal FDCPA's fee-shifting provision allows consumer-defense lawyers to take some cases at no out-of-pocket cost. The National Association of Consumer Advocates directory is a starting point. State legal aid, state bar lawyer referral services, and law school clinics also handle some cases. Pro se filing of the answer is better than no answer.

What happens after I file the answer?

The case enters discovery. Both sides exchange documents and written questions. Discovery is followed by motion practice. Often a summary judgment motion by the plaintiff. And then maybe trial. The exact path depends on the rules of the court. And the choices both sides make.

Educational only. Not legal advice.

I am a Florida trial lawyer, licensed only in Florida. I am not licensed in any other state, U.S. territory, or foreign jurisdiction. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client, fiduciary, or advisory relationship. Consumer debt-collection law and court procedures vary by state. Verify every rule, deadline, and remedy against the law where you live. If you have a problem like the one described above, the strongest protection is a consumer-debt-defense attorney licensed in your state. Many consumer-protection statutes include fee-shifting and damages multipliers, which often makes representation affordable.